Cori Gauff vs Aryna Sabalenka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Jun at 06:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Gauff vs A. Sabalenka

USA
6
Win
Played
5
Win

BLR
6
Win
Played
5
Win
Head-To-Head: Gauff 6 - 5 Sabalenka
They have played 28 sets in total, with Cori Gauff winning 14 and Aryna Sabalenka winning 14. The last match between Cori Gauff and Aryna Sabalenka was at the French Open - Paris, 07-06-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Cori Gauff getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gauff | 6 |
Sabalenka | 5 |
Last H2H Matches:
(F) French Open - Paris(06-07-25)
(F) Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(05-03-25)
(SF) WTA Finals - Riyadh(11-08-24)
C. Gauff vs A. Sabalenka H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$17,907,129 | Career Prize Money | $36,351,103 |
70.68% (270-112) | Career Total W/L | 70.69% (480-199) |
2 | Clay | 1 |
3 | Hard | 3 |
1 | Indoor | 1 |
11 | Titles | 27 |
6 | Total H2H Matches | 5 |
75.93% (41-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 84.85% (56-10) |
2 | YTD Titles | 4 |
C. Gauff vs A. Sabalenka Match Preview
- In recent second serve performance, Sabalenka edges out Gauff slightly with 39.45% of points won, opposed to Gauff's 38.57%.
- Gauff outshines Sabalenka in return stats, winning 53.49% of opponents' second serve points compared to 48.93% by Sabalenka. Could this be the decisive factor?
- For first serve returns, both players perform almost equally, with Gauff slightly ahead at 29.9% compared to Sabalenka's 29.68%.
- Under pressure, Sabalenka saves 52.91% of breakpoints, better than Gauff's 46.52%—a critical element in high-pressure matches.
- Over the last year, Sabalenka has a higher overall win rate of 84.81% in matches played, while Gauff stands at 76.06%.
- Their head-to-head record is even, with each player having won 5 matches. Sabalenka has won 13 sets to Gauff's 12.
- Sabalenka has the edge on hard courts with a 74% win rate, while Gauff's best is on clay at 73%.
- When matches go the distance, Gauff has a 73% success rate in deciding sets, superior to Sabalenka's 63%.
- Sabalenka has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, with a rank of 36.82, while Gauff faced players ranked around 48.27.
- In breakpoint conversion, Gauff excels with a 45.24% success rate compared to Sabalenka's 34.01%—a crucial statistic for capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match promises to be highly competitive, with both Sabalenka and Gauff exhibiting strong performances in recent times. Sabalenka's slight superiority in second serve performance and composure under pressure might give her an edge in pivotal moments.
However, Gauff's excellent return game and higher breakpoint conversion rate could tilt the balance in her favor, especially if she capitalizes on those opportunities effectively.
Their head-to-head record is evenly split, and with both players extremely close in overall performance, this match could likely go the distance.
With Gauff demonstrating a better win rate in deciding sets and facing lower-ranked opponents historically, her ability to remain resilient could prove to be decisive. Given the data, Gauff seems slightly favored to win this closely contested match, but it will be a tight battle.
Cori Gauff vs Aryna Sabalenka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Gauff vs A. Sabalenka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
6 | H2H Matches Won | 5 |
14 | Sets Won | 14 |
147 | Games Won | 140 |
41 | Aces (Total) | 40 |
87 | Total Double Faults | 60 |
2:6:13 | Avg. Match Time | 2:6:13 |
60% (577/957) | 1st Serve % | 60% (560/938) |
64% (372/577) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (357/560) |
43% (163/380) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (169/378) |
50% (51/102) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (48/117) |
44% (412/938) | Return Pts Won % | 44% (422/957) |
55% (6/11) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 45% (5/11) |
67% (4/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (2/6) |
67% (4/6) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 60% (3/5) |
33% (2/6) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 40% (2/5) |
40% (2/5) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 33% (2/6) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Gauff Recent Matches Played
A. Sabalenka Recent Matches Played

C. Gauff vs A. Sabalenka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
70.68% (270/112) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.69% (480/199) |
65.70% (569/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 66.58% (1060/532) |
56.03% (4479/3515) | Games Win/Loss | 56.14% (8361/6532) |
70.18% (153/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.99% (293/103) |
73.15% (79/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (100/50) |
70.00% (14/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.79% (46/25) |
66.67% (24/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.13% (41/21) |
0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
1356 | Aces Total | 2796 |
0.52 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
2048 | Total Double Faults | 2843 |
1:34:26 | Average Match Time | 1:30:49 |
194.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 281.89 |
61% (15553/25606) | 1st Serve % | 60% (27467/45446) |
68% (10622/15553) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (18921/27467) |
44% (4469/10047) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8504/17968) |
49% (1563/3204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2551/5453) |
46% (11753/25599) | Return Points Win % | 45% (20300/45182) |
75.73% (78/25) | Slam W/L | 77.78% (105/30) |
67.12% (98/48) | Masters W/L | 70.87% (146/60) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
73.00% (73/27) | Main Tour W/L | 67.93% (125/59) |
64.52% (20/11) | Challenger W/L | 64.89% (61/33) |
0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (33/11) |
70% (264/376) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (477/675) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
62% (55/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (111/180) |
67% (70/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (134/237) |
92% (249/229) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (457/408) |
8% (249/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (457/48) |
29% (133/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 32% (222/71) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
